School Grades
School Grades
Daniel Jenkins Academy Of Technology Middle School 2011 Grade
Grade
A
B
C
D
F
A
B
C
D
F
N/A
2011
A
N/A
2010
A
N/A
2009
A
N/A
2008
A
N/A
2007
A
N/A
2006
A
N/A
2005
A
N/A
2004
B
N/A
2003
A
N/A
2002
B
| 2011 Grade | |
|---|---|
| A | |
| School Type | Middle |
| Title 1 Status | YES |
| AYP Status | NO |
| Percent Tested | 100% |
| 50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains | YES |
| Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading | N/A |
| 50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math | YES |
| Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Math | N/A |
| Charter School | NO |
| Reduced Lunch Rate | 68% |
| 2011 Points Earned | |
|---|---|
| 528 | |
| Percent Meeting High Standard in Reading | 69 |
| Percent Meeting High Standard in Math | 72 |
| Percent Meeting High Standard in Writing | 81 |
| Percent Meeting High Standard in Science | 57 |
| Percente Making Reading Gains | 61 |
| Percente Making Math Gains | 63 |
| Percent of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading | 59 |
| Percent of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math | 66 |
| FCAT Retake | NA |
More
- • View Daniel Jenkins Academy Of Technology Middle School FCAT Scores
- • Go to Daniel Jenkins Academy Of Technology Middle School Main Page
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Status
| Subjects | Students with Disabilities | |||||||||
| English Language Learners | ||||||||||
| Economically Disadvantaged | ||||||||||
| American Indian | ||||||||||
| Asian | ||||||||||
| Hispanic | ||||||||||
| Black | ||||||||||
| White | ||||||||||
| Total | ||||||||||
| Reading Participation | Percent Tested | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | NA | NA | 100 | 100 | NA |
| Number Tested | 497 | 168 | 126 | 176 | 9 | 7 | 337 | 45 | 14 | |
| Tested 95% of the Students? | Y | Y | Y | Y | NA | NA | Y | Y | NA | |
| Math Participation | Percent Tested | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | NA | NA | 100 | 100 | NA |
| Number Tested | 497 | 168 | 126 | 176 | 9 | 7 | 337 | 45 | 14 | |
| Tested 95% of the Students? | Y | Y | Y | Y | NA | NA | Y | Y | NA | Writing Performance | Percent Proficient | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Number with Scores | 165 | 58 | 45 | 54 | 3 | 1 | 109 | 12 | 3 | |
| Improved performance in Writing by 1%? | Y | Y | Y | Y | NA | NA | Y | NA | NA | |
| Reading Proficiency | Percent Proficient | 68 | 72 | 57 | 71 | NA | NA | 64 | NA | NA |
| Number with Scores | 492 | 168 | 125 | 173 | 8 | 7 | 332 | 43 | 14 | |
| 65% scoring at or above grade level in Reading? | NO | NO | NO | NO | NA | NA | NO | NA | NA | |
| Reading Growth Model | Percent on track to be Proficient | 67 | 70 | 56 | 69 | NA | NA | 62 | NA | NA |
| Number with Scores | 484 | 162 | 124 | 173 | 8 | 7 | 330 | 43 | 14 | |
| 65% on track to be Proficient in Reading? | N | N | N | N | NA | NA | N | NA | NA | |
| Math Proficiency | Percent Proficient | 71 | 76 | 58 | 74 | NA | NA | 67 | NA | NA |
| Number with Scores | 492 | 168 | 125 | 173 | 8 | 7 | 332 | 43 | 14 | |
| 68% scoring at or above grade level in Math? | NO | NO | YES | NO | NA | NA | NO | NA | NA | |
| Math Growth Model | Percent on track to be Proficient | 71 | 75 | 59 | 76 | NA | NA | 69 | NA | NA |
| Number with Scores | 484 | 162 | 124 | 173 | 8 | 7 | 330 | 43 | 14 | |
| 68% on track to be Proficient in Math? | N | N | NA | N | NA | NA | N | NA | NA | |
Source: Florida Department of Education