School Grades
Ridge Community High School 2011 Grade
Grade
A
B
C
D
F
A
B
C
D
F
N/A
2011
C
N/A
2010
C
N/A
2009
D
N/A
2008
D
N/A
2007
D
N/A
2006
D
N/A
2005
N/A
2004
N/A
2003
N/A
2002
| 2011 Grade | |
|---|---|
| C | |
| School Type | High |
| Title 1 Status | YES |
| AYP Status | I |
| Percent Tested | 98% |
| 50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains | N/A |
| Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading | N/A |
| 50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math | N/A |
| Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Math | N/A |
| Charter School | NO |
| Reduced Lunch Rate | 69% |
| 2011 Points Earned | |
|---|---|
| N/A | |
| Percent Meeting High Standard in Reading | N/A |
| Percent Meeting High Standard in Math | N/A |
| Percent Meeting High Standard in Writing | N/A |
| Percent Meeting High Standard in Science | N/A |
| Percente Making Reading Gains | N/A |
| Percente Making Math Gains | N/A |
| Percent of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading | N/A |
| Percent of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math | N/A |
| FCAT Retake | N/A |
More
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Status
| Subjects | Students with Disabilities | |||||||||
| English Language Learners | ||||||||||
| Economically Disadvantaged | ||||||||||
| American Indian | ||||||||||
| Asian | ||||||||||
| Hispanic | ||||||||||
| Black | ||||||||||
| White | ||||||||||
| Total | ||||||||||
| Reading Participation | Percent Tested | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Number Tested | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| Tested 95% of the Students? | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| Math Participation | Percent Tested | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Number Tested | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| Tested 95% of the Students? | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| Writing Performance | Percent Proficient | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Number with Scores | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| Improved performance in Writing by 1%? | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| Reading Proficiency | Percent Proficient | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Number with Scores | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| 65% scoring at or above grade level in Reading? | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| Reading Growth Model | Percent on track to be Proficient | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Number with Scores | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| 65% on track to be Proficient in Reading? | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| Math Proficiency | Percent Proficient | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Number with Scores | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| 68% scoring at or above grade level in Math? | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| Math Growth Model | Percent on track to be Proficient | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Number with Scores | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| 68% on track to be Proficient in Math? | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
Source: Florida Department of Education